Do artists usually paint over/trace photographs in order to make a realistic painting? - can you cheat a digital copy
I am always surprised me how artists paint what they see, without monitor or copy any. How to paint the artist to realistic and proportionate return before photography or computer?
Thus, the digital painting painters are still the traditional way (not to "trap" for want of a better way to describe it), or in general with real photographs and paintings, they begin to paint the same?
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Can You Cheat A Digital Copy Do Artists Usually Paint Over/trace Photographs In Order To Make A Realistic Painting?
2 comments:
Remember, what is the purpose of art. It's about more than just a drawing that looks like something. The process of creating a work of art is beautiful, especially when you do something important, and a bold contemporary statement. Anyone who has something in his brain, which is rented out, and his art, regardless of the discipline that is liberation.
I work in a realistic style and expected my photos and drawings on canvas and on the road. But my intention is to see not only how something. That, and it took me 2 years drawing lessons, and I am a very capable artist. I think someone does a disservice not to go through the learning. Follow not cheat, but you can not go wrong skills for learning, but he did.
If art on the content and focus on the transmission of the narrative material is based, etc ... and monitoring, can be a means to an end. The hard-core, blood, sweat and tears that people will disagree and say that it's about experience, "and & quot; learning. But sometimes I prefer to paint while working on a huge drawing of 2 weeks.
Drawing before the arrest of painting and does not begin with the proportions and composition. So we have the basis for realistic proportions. Thereafter, the majority of realism through the use of color is achieved. Just because you can follow, it does not mean you can paint. Can not you picture.
The person who mentioned the camera obscura and the mirrors have an argument on merits. Read more about the Hockney-Falco thesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockney-Falco_thesis
In addition, the major networks also together with the images.
I do not think that many artists, followed by a photo. However, the tracing of projections for hundreds of years. That is, I believe that most artists do not go back.
The following table is the worst thing to do.
The image is already an interpretation of a particular case. If you applied to the image, you do not need to feel the object. But you feel the paper in a 2-dimensional plane. It will begin a representation of a representation which had been missing from the life of the image.
Draw a picture or a reference to the real thing is much better because they are the 5 senses, if you use the new work. Basically he did what the camera could do: represent the object in a 2-dimensional plane.
The artists have their pictures look so realistic, through centuries of art theory, which for decades their own investigations. Artists really "reviews" for certain objects or people or animals, to get an idea of how truly grasp its textures.
Post a Comment